Posterous theme by Cory Watilo

Filed under: Musings

More TG3

So I've had the TG3 for a couple of days now and I've had a chance to play. I have to say I'm loving this thing!

I just wanted to give a quick example of why.

On Saturday I went out with both the TG3 and the camera is is replacing, my Canon FS100. Attached are two screen grabs from video taken at Jerberg point.

First the Canon

Then the Sony

Even shrunken down you can see the difference, but click on the images to view size to see the real difference.
<script src="http://www.nezza.net/files/FancyZoom.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script src="http://www.nezza.net/files/FancyZoomHTML.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script type="text/javascript">var zoomImagesURI = 'http://www.nezza.net/files/';setupZoom();</script>

Sony TG3

The Sony HDR-TG3 Flash Media Camcorder

Last April I linked to a press release of a new Sony flash media camcorder called the TG3 (or TG1 in the States).

And today I finally got mu grubby little mitts on one.

At the time I said:

It sounds like it beats the hell out of my little Sanyo, but I get the feeling it will be rather more expensive as well. Still brushed aluminum would look good next to my macbook Air.

Well I was right about it being better then the Sanyo, and I was right about it being expensive. I was wrong about it being brushed aluminum though - it's actually made from titanium, and yes it does look good next to a Macbook Air. I haven't had much of a chance to play with it yet, but the first impressions are very favourable. It feels very well made. Is actually slightly heaver then I expected, maybe a touch heaver then my LX3. First video has been a little mixed. It was practically dark when I got home, and indoors isn't exactly well lit. Actually its terribly lit. but it does appear that low-light shooting is not the TG3's strong point. The clips I've seen on Vimeo in daylight look much, much better. So I'm not exactly worried.

Mac Compatibility

As usual Sony excels itself by providing zero support for the Mac. Keeping up their perfect record with other Sony products I have owned - The W880i phone, the PS3 (media link) and the Reader 505 (despite using Adobe Digital Editions for DRM and loading the books - a program that functions perfectly on the Mac). However iMovie 09 recognises the camera immediately and imports the video with no problems. I could leave it there, after all the process is painless and works but there is a catch - and its a huge one. The camera uses the AVCHD codec for video, and iMovie transcodes this into the Apple Intermediary Codec. This has the effect of hugely inflating the file size of the video - and I do mean hugely.

A recording totaling 4 minutes 14 seconds, came in a ginormous 503mb - over half a gig! I've taken to converting the video using the now defunct, but still excellent, Visualhub. I convert to MP4 using H.264 and the filesize for that particular file has come down to a much more manageable 84.4mb. Whilst I can understand iMovies need to convert the original video. I do wish that it would allow me the option of choosing which codec I want to use.

I'm really looking forward to using this little beauty, and I hope it it gets me filming more in the same way that the LX3 has rekindled my passion for photography.

<script src="http://www.nezza.net/files/FancyZoom.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script src="http://www.nezza.net/files/FancyZoomHTML.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script type="text/javascript">var zoomImagesURI = 'http://www.nezza.net/files/';setupZoom();</script>

Spam

I've just logged into an old e-mail account for the first time in a couple of years. The change in tact by the spammers is most amusing.

A year ago I was offered fake Rolex's, Viagra and tips on how to pull. One global economic downturn later and I'm being offered discount loans and fake degrees (because you won't get a job without one).

Obsessed much?

One of my favourite websites is LastFM.com. It's a music site that tracks what you're listening to, and recommends tracks and artists that you may like based on your listening habits.

As it tracks the songs you listen to, it can also provide you with your own charts of listens and you can view other peoples.

It was whilst browsing through some of these that I came across this:

When you've listened to one artist so many times, that the rest of your top 15 combined, and then a third of tracks are the same song; it may just be time to get professional help. Or at least a new album to listen too.

You can take the piss out of my listening habits by checking my charts - here. Just bare in mind that I so get pissed and sing along to cheesy crap a lot. <script src="http://www.nezza.net/files/FancyZoom.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script src="http://www.nezza.net/files/FancyZoomHTML.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script type="text/javascript">var zoomImagesURI = 'http://www.nezza.net/files/';setupZoom();</script>

That was rubbish Spurs!

I'd never been as ashamed of Spurs as I was last night. We didn't deserve to go through and I feel so sorry for Burnley.

But go through we did and I've been looking around trying to get a ticket for the final.

It's not looking too promising. As I don't hold a season ticket the likelyhood of getting one through the club is remote. The cheapest I've found costs the same as last years trip to Turkey. That's not including any flights of course! I really want to go, but I just can't justify psying that much.

I may have to settle for watching it on TV and going to a Premiership match instead.

One things for certain. I want to get out of Guernsey for a few days. I'm starting to go a little stir-crazy.
Mobile Blogging from here.

How photography became a passion.

Media_httpfarm3static_xhabw

This is the photo that caused me to take up photography as a hobby.

Being a gadget nut, I'd actually owned digital cameras since they first starting appearing on shelves in the high street stores. I had my first real job and I remember spending nearly a months wages on a fixed focus Fuji, and then only being able to take 8 photos at at a time because I couldn't afford the smartmedia memory card until the following month. Those photos were mainly of friends, and it was amazing to me as I didn't have to spend money at Boots after a night out, and get half my shots back with little stickers telling me how bad my photos were.

I kept that Fuji for years, eventually replacing it with a Sony Cybershot U-20. A tiny camera that I really could take anywhere. It had the smallest screen, a fixed focus and no controls except a shutter release - but it took a surprisingly good snapshot.

Then I got my first 'real' digital camera - a Kodak LS633. I'd picked it up cheaply in a sale. I didn't really know anything about it as a camera, but it had stuck in my mind for two reasons. First it was the first consumer product to use a OLED screen (as I said - gadget nut), and secondly it came with Mac software. Something that really was a rarity in those days.

I loved the screen, which was excellent and having a camera with zoom was a revelation. But most important of all was it produced these rich colour saturated images that made me feel like I was better then I really was.

Within a week of getting the camera, I was off on holiday with my friends. A real road trip down through France into Aquitaine, and staying in a villa around 40km from Bordeaux.

I got the bug bad that holiday, taking photos of everything in sight. A quick look in Lightroom shows nearly 900 images taken that week alone - I'd taken 550 in the entire two years previously.

On one of the days, we went into Bordeaux itself. Near where we parked they have this stunning war memorial. An angel atop a column, surrounded by fountains and marble statues. That is where this photo was taken. I remember 'chimping' at the screen and an being rather impressed with myself. I knew instantly it was the best photo I'd ever taken, and spent rather a long time that day trying to better it around Bordeaux.

It was the first time I really thought about framing a subject. A vast improvement on my previously snatched shots. When we got back to the villa I couldn't wait to see it on my iBook's screen. I didn't do any kind of processing then, I didn't really know how other then to stick the saturation levels up in iPhoto! But as I say, the bug was caught and I learned how to make improvements using a computer, and that over-saturation wasn't the answer to everything.

So this was the photo that lead to me buying a camera with a few more controls. Which lead to a camera that had manual controls. After a lot of experimentation, but a surprisingly short amount of time, that lead on to an SLR. After which the dizzying world of lenses, filters and speedlights came calling together with evenings sitting on the West Coast, listening to Terry Pratchett novels on my iPod just waiting for the sun to hit the horizon and hoping that that some colour will appear in the sky before it sets for the night.

Footballers

Always with the unreasonable wage demands.

<script src="http://www.nezza.net/files/FancyZoom.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script src="http://www.nezza.net/files/FancyZoomHTML.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script type="text/javascript">var zoomImagesURI = 'http://www.nezza.net/files/';setupZoom();</script>

Eh?

So PETA's latest campaign is to rename fish 'Sea Kittens'.

Media_httpwwwpetaorgs_tobqe

Whilst in agreement that fish stocks need careful management, and species such as Cod need stricter catch limits applied to allow recovery. I really don't think that this is the way to go about it. It seems that every week I see a new PETA campaign launched with the now usual heavy handed bias and lack of tact. My personal favourite being the 'Cooking Mama Kills Animals' flash game late last year. The sad thing is that on me personally this completely backfired as I viewed as a surreally humorous game.

Peta do not have the best public image, and I read too many stories about them going on the attack whilst having their facts wrong leading to some high profile retractions. The message and the points they try to make are lost because many people simply do not trust them as an organisation.

These are important issues. But I would suggest becoming involved with more respected organisatons such as the RSPA or the National Geographic Society. Organisations that complete important work in these fields, but do not feel the need for media grabbing publicity stunts.

<script src="http://www.nezza.net/files/FancyZoom.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script src="http://www.nezza.net/files/FancyZoomHTML.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script type="text/javascript">var zoomImagesURI = 'http://www.nezza.net/files/';setupZoom();</script>